Dear Friends,
Among other interesting activities, I moderate comments on a health blog. While the blog is popular and, on any given day, we may receive 10-15 comments, in this very special time of the year, we are averaging more like a comment a minute.
While, in the main, no one objects to the blog's new found popularity, I might point out that most of these contributions seem to be unintelligible. Often, these are thinly disguised as actual comments to posts -- "Specifically where there is married life with no romance, you will have romance with no married life"-- is one I noted as particularly irrelevant on a blog devoted to preventing teen drug abuse and addiction. Although one must also admire the daring of those discount pharmaceuticals attempting to peddle generic prescription drugs on a blog warning of the dangers of addiction!
Attention all spammers: I appreciate most those messages that demonstrate are outright selling as opposed to layering a thin veneer of commentary over an otherwise blatant spam. Nike's, Christian LaBoutain, Burberry, NFL jackets and Uggs are among the most popular, judging by the entries to-date. But social bookmarking and link building are also appreciative, though lesser known as brands.
But for those really inventive resellers, you cannot beat the creativity of wrapping a clearly fictitious article about the Israeli prime minister resigning and the PLO representative's reaction around the charade of selling pens and sunglasses:
Israeli Defense Ecclesiastic [montblancpensonlinesale]
Ehud Barak announced his acclimatization Monday, saying he
inclination quit civil affairs in January to lavish more time with his
family.
His resigning mont blanc
comes at a warmly delicate time for Israel, which is observing a
tenuous cease-fire with the hostile Palestinian unit Hamas after an
eight-day tiff that killed more than 160 people — the mind-blowing
majority of them Palestinians in Gaza.
Barak, who is married and the shepherd of three children, [montblancpensonlinesale]
said Monday at a word talk in Tel Aviv that he will proceed as defense
assist for the next three months, as elections are apposite in January.
He said he won’t debate the elections.
Hanan Ashrawi, a fellow of the Palestine Unshackling Consortium’s executive body, weighed in on the announcement.
“I contemplate this signals identification [lunettesdesoleilraybans]
of the futility of the military overtures in the adoption of fury as
means of dealing with the Palestinians,” she said. “If it is for
intimate reasons, we cannot opine, but if it’s recognition that his
complete tear was based on the military proposition to public existence,
then this demonstrates the recognition of the futility of militarism
and violence.”
Some Israeli factional commentators had speculated ahead of the
commercial that Barak was planning to quit the government of Prime
Churchman Benjamin Netanyahu to form a new center-left party.
A bid for Ehud Barak's shepharding a peace process in the Sinai, perhaps?
For all of the above, helpful links to the products abound, and in many languages: Japanese, French, Spanish, German, Dutch, English, and variations given fractured sellers helpers from Eastern Europe, not to mention the ever-present Spambots that must rely on Google algorithms and half-baked translations for their creative message management.
And the festive holiday season has just begun!
Question to the blogosphere: how are you managing this season's Spamalot? Surely there are better ways to see that actual questions and comments are addressed without succumbing to brand-name Season's Greetings!
And question to brands and their resellers: do you think your messages of cheerful consumption or comments wrapped around irrelevant stories are the most effective way of reaching consumers? Or is it just cheap and easy and you're thinking, "Couldn't hurt to cover all bases?"
I am curious to know...
Sincerely,
Robin Stevens Payes, Principal
Creating and Implementing Marketing Strategies
Health Communications and Social Marketing
WordsWork Communications LLC
WordsWork Communications works with clients in health, medicine and education to share their stories to improve awareness, enhance understanding and promote more conscious change.
Showing posts with label brand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brand. Show all posts
Monday, November 26, 2012
Sunday, January 4, 2009
Communicating results.
Where's the ROI?
As principal of WordsWork Communications, I am frequently asked by prospective clients to justify the expense for marketing. After all, can't everyone write a press release (no, but this is a subject for another time). It is right, though, that clients expect some return-on-investment for hiring our firm. With so many channels, both new and traditional, and so much clutter for people's attention in the marketplace, what value does WordsWork, or any firm for that matter, bring to the table?
I am grappling with the new rules of delivering on a promise to clients. The burden of proof falls on us practitioners now, more than ever, to substantiate the effectiveness of the marketing, communications and public relations we create for clients has been an integral component of what we deliver. Only natural, you might guess, if you were looking for a consulting firm to create your identity, to deliver sales, get you on The Today Show or to bring in donors, but after all, there are so many other factors involved in the dynamic of your success, particularly in the current economic cycle, that no one in this business can guarantee such outcomes.
In the emerging world of traditional and social marketing, how do we deliver? When you can't control all that is said - the good, the bad and the ugly - via blogging, online posts, company Intranets and all the derivatives is it still true that even bad press is a good thing?
What about the brand? Does style, consistency, medium and message still matter?
Talking about clients today in a way that yields the desired results is no longer about control of the message, or relationships with gatekeepers. WE are the gatekeepers, as is everyone else with a computer and an interest - or a vendetta.
How do other people in the marketing/promotion/advertising/brand-building business answer the question: in the current Web 2.0, how do we get our clients the results they are looking for?
Looking for how clients are choose the firms that deliver - and how fellow practitioners are proving to their clients that they do, in fact, deliver.
As principal of WordsWork Communications, I am frequently asked by prospective clients to justify the expense for marketing. After all, can't everyone write a press release (no, but this is a subject for another time). It is right, though, that clients expect some return-on-investment for hiring our firm. With so many channels, both new and traditional, and so much clutter for people's attention in the marketplace, what value does WordsWork, or any firm for that matter, bring to the table?
I am grappling with the new rules of delivering on a promise to clients. The burden of proof falls on us practitioners now, more than ever, to substantiate the effectiveness of the marketing, communications and public relations we create for clients has been an integral component of what we deliver. Only natural, you might guess, if you were looking for a consulting firm to create your identity, to deliver sales, get you on The Today Show or to bring in donors, but after all, there are so many other factors involved in the dynamic of your success, particularly in the current economic cycle, that no one in this business can guarantee such outcomes.
In the emerging world of traditional and social marketing, how do we deliver? When you can't control all that is said - the good, the bad and the ugly - via blogging, online posts, company Intranets and all the derivatives is it still true that even bad press is a good thing?
What about the brand? Does style, consistency, medium and message still matter?
Talking about clients today in a way that yields the desired results is no longer about control of the message, or relationships with gatekeepers. WE are the gatekeepers, as is everyone else with a computer and an interest - or a vendetta.
How do other people in the marketing/promotion/advertising/brand-building business answer the question: in the current Web 2.0, how do we get our clients the results they are looking for?
Looking for how clients are choose the firms that deliver - and how fellow practitioners are proving to their clients that they do, in fact, deliver.
Labels:
brand,
identity,
marketing,
media,
public relations,
social marketing,
Web2.0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)